Recumbent Cycle Vs. Stationary Bike

Both recumbent cycles and stationary, or upright, bikes are effective in improving cardiovascular health and decreasing body fat. There are distinct differences, however, and deciding which one is appropriate is important for a user's motivation and consistency.

  1. Identification

    • Recumbent cycles have a back rest and the user sits reclined, legs out in front. A stationary bike is more upright, pedals directly under the user.

    Features

    • Stationary bikes are typically less expensive than recumbent cycles. In addition, they usually have a smaller base, taking up less space.

    Benefits

    • Both provide effective cardiovascular workouts by increasing a user's heart rate into the training zone. They are a great option for users with weight-bearing concerns and those who cannot walk or run.

    Considerations

    • Users with balance concerns may want to choose a recumbent cycle, which is lower to the ground. The reclined position reduces the chance of falling off.

      Because of the upright position of a stationary bike, users may find the seat becomes uncomfortable during longer sessions. The stationary bike allows users to stand while pedaling, offering the opportunity to increase resistance and thus intensity.

    Misconceptions

    • Although some believe recumbent cycles aren't as effective, adjustments can be made, such as increasing resistance or pedaling speed, to raise the heart rate appropriately.